HomeAbout usProjectsPublicationsNewslettersConferencesMediaNewsContactSearchLogin
News
Search
Sign up for Newsletter
20 May 2008
FT: Shell investors rebel over retention pay
Source: www.ft.com

By Tom Burgis, Michael Steen and Kate Burgess in London

Published: May 20 2008 20:43 | Last updated: May 20 2008 23:44

Royal Dutch Shell faced an investor revolt at its annual meeting on Tuesday when just under half of voting shareholders failed to back a plan to award three executives €1m (£795,000) bonuses to stay in their jobs.

The pay protest at the meeting in The Hague was one of the most significant for a UK company since GlaxoSmithKline’s investors rejected the healthcare group’s controversial pay policies for senior executives in 2003.

One-third of Shell shareholders who voted on the bonus plan opposed it. Combined with those who withheld their votes, 49.5 per cent of voting shareholders did not support the bonuses.

The Shell rebellion adds to a chorus of dissent over so-called “retention payments” – bonuses for executives to dissuade them from leaving a company.

The Anglo-Dutch oil company plans to make retention payments to the three likely candidates to succeed Jeroen van der Veer, who steps down as chief executive in June next year: Peter Voser, chief financial officer; Malcolm Brinded, head of exploration and production; and Linda Cook, gas and power chief.

The fifth board executive, Rob Routs, head of oil sands and refining, is due to depart by the end of the year.

The bonuses, each worth about €1m in stock, become payable in 2011, provided the three are still in their posts. Investors objected in part because of the lack of performance hurdles. The awards could, however, be reduced.

Peter Montagnon, director of investment affairs at the Association of British Insurers, said: “Dissent of this size is something that should make companies think quite carefully about using retention payments in the future.” BP, Rexam, the packaging group, Bradford and Bingley and Reed Elsevier also have been rebuked by shareholders this year for making or planning retention payments.

David Paterson, head of UK research at shareholder advisory service Risk Metrics, said retention awards were “not consistent with the normal structure that aligns the individual executive’s interests with that of the shareholders’.”

The rebellion at Shell was not enough to stall the plan. Sir Peter Job, chairman of Shell’s remuneration committee, said ahead of the vote: “We are going into a period of scheduled change at the top and we thought this was the right thing to do.”
News
2 November 2010
SRI-Adviser: Midterm Elections Challenge Priorities of Sustainable Investors and Shareowner Advocates
1 November 2010
SocialFunds: Women and Minorities Are Underrepresented in Highest-Paid Executive Positions
1 November 2010
Management & Excellence: Itaú-Unibanco is most sustainable bank in Latin America for 6th consecutive year
29 October 2010
Responsible-Investor: Dutch pension fund PNO excludes Wal-Mart over labour standards
29 October 2010
SRI-Adviser: Leading Companies Are Taking Proactive Approach to bisphenol A in food can linings
28 October 2010
SocialFunds: Water Scarcity Is a Growing Risk for Public Utilities and for Investors in Municipal Bonds
27 October 2010
Responsible-Investor: SAM founder and former CEO, Reto Ringger, outlines plans for new sustainability bank
27 October 2010
SRI-Adviser: Investors Urge California Voters to Reject Proposition 32
26 October 2010
SocialFunds: Will the Principles for Responsible Investment Prevail in the US?
25 October 2010
SRI-Adviser: Newsweek Publishes Second Annual Green Rankings of Companies
[1]​[2]​[3]​[4]​[5]​[6]​[7]​[8]​[9]​[10]​[11]​[12]​[13]​[14]​[15]​[16]​[17]​[18]​[19]​[20]​[21]​[22]​[23]​[24]​[25]​[26]​[27]​[28]​[29]​[30]​[31]​[32]​[33]​[34]​[35]​[36]​[37]​[38]​[39]​[40]​[41]​[42]​[43]​[44]​[45]​[46]​[47]​[48]​[49]​[50]​[51]​[52]​[53]​[54]​[55]​[56]​[57]​[58]​[59]​[60]​[61]​[62]​[63]​[64]​[65]​[66]​[67]​[68]​[69]​[70]​[71]​[72]​[73]​[74]​[75]​[76]​[77]​[78]​[79]​[80]​[81]​[82]​[83]​[84]​[85]​[86]​[87]​[88]​[89]​[90]​[91]​[92]​[93]​[94]​[95]​[96]​[97]​[98]​[99]​[100]​[101]​[102]​[103]​[104]​[105]​[106]​[107]​[108]​[109]​[110]​[111]​[112]​[113]​[114]​[115]​[116]​[117]​[118]​[119]​[120]​[121]​[122]​[123]​[124]​[125]​[126]​[127]​[128]​[129]​[130]​[131]​[132]​[133]​[134]​[135]​[136]​
Sustainable Investment Research Platform
Provided by Webforum