HomeAbout usProjectsPublicationsNewslettersConferencesMediaNewsContactSearchLogin
News
Search
Sign up for Newsletter
20 May 2008
FT: Shell investors rebel over retention pay
Source: www.ft.com

By Tom Burgis, Michael Steen and Kate Burgess in London

Published: May 20 2008 20:43 | Last updated: May 20 2008 23:44

Royal Dutch Shell faced an investor revolt at its annual meeting on Tuesday when just under half of voting shareholders failed to back a plan to award three executives €1m (£795,000) bonuses to stay in their jobs.

The pay protest at the meeting in The Hague was one of the most significant for a UK company since GlaxoSmithKline’s investors rejected the healthcare group’s controversial pay policies for senior executives in 2003.

One-third of Shell shareholders who voted on the bonus plan opposed it. Combined with those who withheld their votes, 49.5 per cent of voting shareholders did not support the bonuses.

The Shell rebellion adds to a chorus of dissent over so-called “retention payments” – bonuses for executives to dissuade them from leaving a company.

The Anglo-Dutch oil company plans to make retention payments to the three likely candidates to succeed Jeroen van der Veer, who steps down as chief executive in June next year: Peter Voser, chief financial officer; Malcolm Brinded, head of exploration and production; and Linda Cook, gas and power chief.

The fifth board executive, Rob Routs, head of oil sands and refining, is due to depart by the end of the year.

The bonuses, each worth about €1m in stock, become payable in 2011, provided the three are still in their posts. Investors objected in part because of the lack of performance hurdles. The awards could, however, be reduced.

Peter Montagnon, director of investment affairs at the Association of British Insurers, said: “Dissent of this size is something that should make companies think quite carefully about using retention payments in the future.” BP, Rexam, the packaging group, Bradford and Bingley and Reed Elsevier also have been rebuked by shareholders this year for making or planning retention payments.

David Paterson, head of UK research at shareholder advisory service Risk Metrics, said retention awards were “not consistent with the normal structure that aligns the individual executive’s interests with that of the shareholders’.”

The rebellion at Shell was not enough to stall the plan. Sir Peter Job, chairman of Shell’s remuneration committee, said ahead of the vote: “We are going into a period of scheduled change at the top and we thought this was the right thing to do.”
News
14 January 2010
SocialFunds: Investors Urge Companies to Keep Minerals from War-Torn Congo Out of Supply Chains
13 January 2010
SRI-Adviser: Google to Review Business Operations in China Following Cyber-Attacks
12 January 2010
SocialFunds: Investors Remain at Risk Due to Corporate Breaches of Supply Chain Standards
12 January 2010
Responsible-Investor: UK investors join with politicians for mandatory GHG reporting call
10 January 2010
Responsible-Investor: UN pension fund seeks $200k budget for external RI consultant
7 January 2010
SRI-Adviser: Despite Improvements in Corporate Disclosure and Regulatory Oversight, Many Asset Managers Still Do Not Consider Climate Change in Analyses
6 January 2010
Responsible-Investor: Bank of Norway details first RFPs for raft of enviro equity mandates in euro2.5bn programme
5 January 2010
SocialFunds: TIAA-CREF Divests its Holdings in Oil Companies Operating in Sudan
5 January 2010
SRI-Adviser: Indian Government Issues Voluntary Guidelines for Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility
5 January 2010
Responsible-Investor: France’s FRR fires Dexia from 100m euro+ SRI mandate
[1]​[2]​[3]​[4]​[5]​[6]​[7]​[8]​[9]​[10]​[11]​[12]​[13]​[14]​[15]​[16]​[17]​[18]​[19]​[20]​[21]​[22]​[23]​[24]​[25]​[26]​[27]​[28]​[29]​[30]​[31]​[32]​[33]​[34]​[35]​[36]​[37]​[38]​[39]​[40]​[41]​[42]​[43]​[44]​[45]​[46]​[47]​[48]​[49]​[50]​[51]​[52]​[53]​[54]​[55]​[56]​[57]​[58]​[59]​[60]​[61]​[62]​[63]​[64]​[65]​[66]​[67]​[68]​[69]​[70]​[71]​[72]​[73]​[74]​[75]​[76]​[77]​[78]​[79]​[80]​[81]​[82]​[83]​[84]​[85]​[86]​[87]​[88]​[89]​[90]​[91]​[92]​[93]​[94]​[95]​[96]​[97]​[98]​[99]​[100]​[101]​[102]​[103]​[104]​[105]​[106]​[107]​[108]​[109]​[110]​[111]​[112]​[113]​[114]​[115]​[116]​[117]​[118]​[119]​[120]​[121]​[122]​[123]​[124]​[125]​[126]​[127]​[128]​[129]​[130]​[131]​[132]​[133]​[134]​[135]​[136]​
Sustainable Investment Research Platform
Provided by Webforum