HomeAbout usProjectsPublicationsNewslettersConferencesMediaNewsContactSearchLogin
News
Search
Sign up for Newsletter
2 October 2009
Responsible Investor: Norway’s SWF manager gets tough on governance with US and UK companies
Source: www.responsibleinvestor.com

Four US companies targeted on CEO/chair split, fund manager also lays out views on UK Walker report


Norges Bank Investment Management, the €290bn ($432bn) manager of the Norwegian Government Pension Fund, has announced a major corporate global governance campaign that will see it challenge four major US companies to split their chairman and chief executive roles. It is also throwing its considerable weight in the UK stock market – as owner of £32bn worth of UK listed shares – behind moves to push all UK corporate directors to be re-elected every year, a tougher position than recommended by the recent draft Walker review on corporate governance by Sir David Walker, former chairman of Morgan Stanley. The final Walker report is expected later this year.
Speaking at a dedicated seminar in London, this morning (October 2), Anne Kvam, global head of corporate governance at NBIM, said the fund would target US companies Harris Corporation, the Florida-based communications company, Clorox Company, the cleaning products group, Parker Hannifin, the engineering company, and Cardinal Health, to lobby the companies to split the top executive positions. Corporate governance advocates contend that separating the chairman and CEO roles improves accountability and provides checks and balances in the boardroom, and US companies are increasingly making the split. NBIM said a similar campaign at Sara Lee, the food and household goods group, had been dropped after the company

agreed to divide the CEO and chair roles. In the UK, where NBIM is one of the biggest equity managers, its decision to publicly push for annual re-election of all company directors takes it beyond the Walker draft, which only recommends that the chair of the remuneration committee should automatically stand for re-election if more than 25% of investors vote against the annual remuneration report. NBIM said it also supported better disclosure of the individual competencies of board directors in order to verify that they are up to the job. Despite these differences, NBIMsaid it broadly supported Walker’s recommendations, notably the introduction of a requirement for fund managers to reveal whether they have a policy on engagement with investee companies, known as the Principles of Stewardship. 
More broadly, Kvam said NBIM was currently engaging on environmental, social and governance (ESG) concerns with 18 companies globally, which she said was an “all-time high” for the manager. The Norwegian Ministry of Finance recently called for a strengthening of the Government Pension Fund’s ‘engagement’ lobbying process via NBIM with companies of concern before opting for the nuclear option of blacklisting from its portfolios.



News
1 July 2010
Responsible-Investor: RiskMetrics president Knut Kjaer exits after MSCI Barra buy-out
1 July 2010
SRI-Adviser: As African Economy Grows, Sustainability Advocates Look to Leapfrog Investment as Usual
1 July 2010
The Guardian: Don't cry for investors burned by BP. They were warned loud and clear
30 June 2010
SocialFunds: Higher Shareowner Votes Are Encouraging, But Not Enough to Change the System
29 June 2010
SocialFunds: FTSE Launches FTSE CDP Carbon Strategy Index Series
29 June 2010
Responsible-Investor: FTSE names Unilever best for UK carbon management
28 June 2010
Responsible-Investor: ESG USA conference report: “To BP or not to BP?”
28 June 2010
SocialFunds: Proxy Access Survives Conference Committee
25 June 2010
SRI-Adviser: Environmental Shareowner Resolutions Gain Record Levels of Support in 2010 Proxy Season
24 June 2010
Responsible-Investor: RI Briefing, June 24: Calvert, Church of England, World Bank, Robeco, Russell
[1]​[2]​[3]​[4]​[5]​[6]​[7]​[8]​[9]​[10]​[11]​[12]​[13]​[14]​[15]​[16]​[17]​[18]​[19]​[20]​[21]​[22]​[23]​[24]​[25]​[26]​[27]​[28]​[29]​[30]​[31]​[32]​[33]​[34]​[35]​[36]​[37]​[38]​[39]​[40]​[41]​[42]​[43]​[44]​[45]​[46]​[47]​[48]​[49]​[50]​[51]​[52]​[53]​[54]​[55]​[56]​[57]​[58]​[59]​[60]​[61]​[62]​[63]​[64]​[65]​[66]​[67]​[68]​[69]​[70]​[71]​[72]​[73]​[74]​[75]​[76]​[77]​[78]​[79]​[80]​[81]​[82]​[83]​[84]​[85]​[86]​[87]​[88]​[89]​[90]​[91]​[92]​[93]​[94]​[95]​[96]​[97]​[98]​[99]​[100]​[101]​[102]​[103]​[104]​[105]​[106]​[107]​[108]​[109]​[110]​[111]​[112]​[113]​[114]​[115]​[116]​[117]​[118]​[119]​[120]​[121]​[122]​[123]​[124]​[125]​[126]​[127]​[128]​[129]​[130]​[131]​[132]​[133]​[134]​[135]​[136]​
Sustainable Investment Research Platform
Provided by Webforum