HomeAbout usProjectsPublicationsNewslettersConferencesMediaNewsContactSearchLogin
News
Search
Sign up for Newsletter
24 March 2010
Responsible-Investor: Quant study shows significant, long-term ESG risk reduction and return boost
Source: www.responsible-investor.com

Research finds strategic portfolio implications on volatility.

The integration of ESG factors into portfolio construction could significantly reduce long-term investment risk and potentially boost returns because of a high probability that companies that don’t manage ESG issues will be more volatile, according to a study by quant researchers at risklab, part of Allianz Global Investors. The quant firm said the research was important because it had notable implications for investor strategic asset allocation decisions, which it said accounted for up to 90% of long-term portfolio risks and are a significant driver of returns. The study, titled: ‘ESG Risk factors in a Portfolio Context’, involved building a quantitative model of ESGrisk factors in a portfolio to determine their influence on equity risk over a 20-year horizon. The firm chose spot price changes of carbon emission rights as a proxy for environmental risks, employee sick days as its social risk criteria, and corporate governance ratings, to ‘operationalise’ ESG risks and run stochastic models with 10,000 different capital markets scenarios. As a reference, risklab created a conservatively balanced portfolio with 30% global equities and 70% bonds and measured the impact of each ESG factor on equity risk within two distinct groups: positive ESG equity where company management actively tries to minimise theESG risk, and negative ESG where the risks are ignored. It then replaced the 30% global equity of

the reference portfolio with either positive or negativeESG equity strategies. It found that the optimised positive ESG equity allocation gave a portfolio tail risk reduction – the likelihood that the risk of a portfolio of assets will move more than 3 standard deviation from its current price – of around 30%, at the same levels of expected return. The same portfolio also gave an increase of expected return of 30 basis points at similar levels of expected portfolio risk. The effects, risklab said, were amplified when comparing riskier portfolios with higher equity allocations. Dr. Steffen Hörter, director at risklab, said: “While much research has been done on ESG opportunities at the stock picking or company analysis level, little has been researched on the link between ESG and the risk/return profile of an entire portfolio. The connection to the portfolio context and strategic asset allocation, which we view as the most important factor driving long-term portfolio returns, has been missing. In the long-term, ESG factors are expected to have significant tail risk impact on equity investments. Therefore, investors should strive to optimise their global equity investments and minimise exposure to ESG risks, which could be achieved by choosing equity investments, where corporate management proactively mitigates these risk factors.”
Download ESG Risk Factors in a Portfolio

News
23 January 2007
Innovest Names the 100 Most Sustainable Companies in the World
18 January 2007
Analyse this: Economist article on Sustainable Investments
11 January 2007
New European research platform for corporate engagement launched
1 January 2007
Dr Kees Koedijk becomes Professor of Financial Management
21 December 2006
ACCA UK Awards for Sustainability Reporting 2006 – shortlist announced
10 December 2006
The Nobel Peace Prize 2006 for the Community Investing through micro-credit
6 December 2006
Nonfinancial Reports Fail to Capture Key Business Risks, Says Study
16 November 2006
New Master''s program in Sustainable Management at USBE
16 November 2006
Mistra post-doc positions
30 October 2006
2006 Moskowitz Prize to Brad Barber, University of California at Davis
[1]​[2]​[3]​[4]​[5]​[6]​[7]​[8]​[9]​[10]​[11]​[12]​[13]​[14]​[15]​[16]​[17]​[18]​[19]​[20]​[21]​[22]​[23]​[24]​[25]​[26]​[27]​[28]​[29]​[30]​[31]​[32]​[33]​[34]​[35]​[36]​[37]​[38]​[39]​[40]​[41]​[42]​[43]​[44]​[45]​[46]​[47]​[48]​[49]​[50]​[51]​[52]​[53]​[54]​[55]​[56]​[57]​[58]​[59]​[60]​[61]​[62]​[63]​[64]​[65]​[66]​[67]​[68]​[69]​[70]​[71]​[72]​[73]​[74]​[75]​[76]​[77]​[78]​[79]​[80]​[81]​[82]​[83]​[84]​[85]​[86]​[87]​[88]​[89]​[90]​[91]​[92]​[93]​[94]​[95]​[96]​[97]​[98]​[99]​[100]​[101]​[102]​[103]​[104]​[105]​[106]​[107]​[108]​[109]​[110]​[111]​[112]​[113]​[114]​[115]​[116]​[117]​[118]​[119]​[120]​[121]​[122]​[123]​[124]​[125]​[126]​[127]​[128]​[129]​[130]​[131]​[132]​[133]​[134]​[135]​[136]​
Sustainable Investment Research Platform
Provided by Webforum