HomeAbout usProjectsPublicationsNewslettersConferencesMediaNewsContactSearchLogin
News
Search
Sign up for Newsletter
24 March 2010
Responsible-Investor: Quant study shows significant, long-term ESG risk reduction and return boost
Source: www.responsible-investor.com

Research finds strategic portfolio implications on volatility.

The integration of ESG factors into portfolio construction could significantly reduce long-term investment risk and potentially boost returns because of a high probability that companies that don’t manage ESG issues will be more volatile, according to a study by quant researchers at risklab, part of Allianz Global Investors. The quant firm said the research was important because it had notable implications for investor strategic asset allocation decisions, which it said accounted for up to 90% of long-term portfolio risks and are a significant driver of returns. The study, titled: ‘ESG Risk factors in a Portfolio Context’, involved building a quantitative model of ESGrisk factors in a portfolio to determine their influence on equity risk over a 20-year horizon. The firm chose spot price changes of carbon emission rights as a proxy for environmental risks, employee sick days as its social risk criteria, and corporate governance ratings, to ‘operationalise’ ESG risks and run stochastic models with 10,000 different capital markets scenarios. As a reference, risklab created a conservatively balanced portfolio with 30% global equities and 70% bonds and measured the impact of each ESG factor on equity risk within two distinct groups: positive ESG equity where company management actively tries to minimise theESG risk, and negative ESG where the risks are ignored. It then replaced the 30% global equity of

the reference portfolio with either positive or negativeESG equity strategies. It found that the optimised positive ESG equity allocation gave a portfolio tail risk reduction – the likelihood that the risk of a portfolio of assets will move more than 3 standard deviation from its current price – of around 30%, at the same levels of expected return. The same portfolio also gave an increase of expected return of 30 basis points at similar levels of expected portfolio risk. The effects, risklab said, were amplified when comparing riskier portfolios with higher equity allocations. Dr. Steffen Hörter, director at risklab, said: “While much research has been done on ESG opportunities at the stock picking or company analysis level, little has been researched on the link between ESG and the risk/return profile of an entire portfolio. The connection to the portfolio context and strategic asset allocation, which we view as the most important factor driving long-term portfolio returns, has been missing. In the long-term, ESG factors are expected to have significant tail risk impact on equity investments. Therefore, investors should strive to optimise their global equity investments and minimise exposure to ESG risks, which could be achieved by choosing equity investments, where corporate management proactively mitigates these risk factors.”
Download ESG Risk Factors in a Portfolio

News
13 February 2009
Responsible Investor: World’s biggest buyout firms sign RI guidelines
12 February 2009
SRI-Adviser:Who Controls the Internet?
12 February 2009
Investment Executive:Banks can play vital role in combating climate change through Ethical Funds
10 February 2009
SocialFunds: New Climate Risk Profiles Assess Corporate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
10 February 2009
Responsible Investor: Danish pension funds join UNPRI en masse following government push
10 February 2009
The New York Times: Equity Giants Take Responsibility Vow
9 February 2009
Investor Daily: The Responsible Investment Association Australasia attracts extra $2.5m in Govt funding
6 February 2009
Money Management: The Australian Government to help establish investment training centre
6 February 2009
SocialFunds:UN Global Compact Calls on Corporations to Address Climate Change
4 February 2009
SRI-Adviser: Who Cares Wins Initiative Issues Final Report
[1]​[2]​[3]​[4]​[5]​[6]​[7]​[8]​[9]​[10]​[11]​[12]​[13]​[14]​[15]​[16]​[17]​[18]​[19]​[20]​[21]​[22]​[23]​[24]​[25]​[26]​[27]​[28]​[29]​[30]​[31]​[32]​[33]​[34]​[35]​[36]​[37]​[38]​[39]​[40]​[41]​[42]​[43]​[44]​[45]​[46]​[47]​[48]​[49]​[50]​[51]​[52]​[53]​[54]​[55]​[56]​[57]​[58]​[59]​[60]​[61]​[62]​[63]​[64]​[65]​[66]​[67]​[68]​[69]​[70]​[71]​[72]​[73]​[74]​[75]​[76]​[77]​[78]​[79]​[80]​[81]​[82]​[83]​[84]​[85]​[86]​[87]​[88]​[89]​[90]​[91]​[92]​[93]​[94]​[95]​[96]​[97]​[98]​[99]​[100]​[101]​[102]​[103]​[104]​[105]​[106]​[107]​[108]​[109]​[110]​[111]​[112]​[113]​[114]​[115]​[116]​[117]​[118]​[119]​[120]​[121]​[122]​[123]​[124]​[125]​[126]​[127]​[128]​[129]​[130]​[131]​[132]​[133]​[134]​[135]​[136]​
Sustainable Investment Research Platform
Provided by Webforum